Saturday, September 1, 2012


English 303: The Theory and Practice of Tutoring Writing is a combination of coursework utilizing scholarship demonstrating the history and evolution of writing center philosophy coupled with field experience through our internship.  And from our readings this week, I felt that we were offered the opportunity to feel the weight of misconception North throws at us in his manifesto, “The Idea of the Writing Center”.  Essentially a mission statement, he implores the English department community to open their eyes to the possibilities for a nearly transcendent experience between writer and tutor. 

I empathized with his frustration regarding the members of his own department not recognizing the true nature of his role as writing center director.  There is a parallel between the role of a parent to young impressionable children who seek guidance and a consultant offering guidance to writers.  And the same can be said for the ever evolving philosophy that drives the writing center today. 

Just as parenting styles have evolved from “tough love”, to “spare the rod and spoil the child”, to the ever present “love and logic”—Lundsford pointed out for us that the style of consulting and overall writing center philosophy has evolved from an authoritative approach to a more collaborative effort among the group of writers and consultants.  But what I can tell you from my own experience both as a student writer and a parent, is that no two writers (children) are alike and it takes the perfect combination of discipline and guidance to ensure that they learn the process and have the capability to apply what they’ve learned to future projects. 

The goal for this semester is to know what combination will work with whom.  Ancillary to that is to get writers who meet with us to get excited about writing.  All too often I feel like there’s pressure for efficiency, meaning spit out your assignment in the shortest amount of time.  But what happened to quality first, then speed??  We were asked the first day of lecture to think about our own manifesto, goals, etc. about the writing center and I can already sense a pull toward “building the fire within” rather than “lighting the fire beneath”.  Does this make sense? 

1 comment:

  1. Hi, Ali!

    Thanks for your first post here! I really appreciated how you were able to relate writing center work to your parenting experience. I find that most new consultants are able to essentially touch back to another experience in their lives as a way of scaffolding a new understanding of what they’ve gotten themselves into (and customer service jobs tend to come up frequently). It does seem to me that parenting is a great place to touch back to. Guidance seems to be a key role in that position, as it is in the Center. I also appreciated how you were able to trace composition philosophies along with parenting philosophies, and how those have (thankfully!) evolved over time. You certainly nailed the spirit of writing center work when you wrote that we should be “building the fire within.” It’s a tall order, though, right? That’s what makes the work so interesting.

    I’m looking forward to reading your next post tomorrow!

    Melissa

    ReplyDelete