It is only as we develop others that we permanently succeed.
--Harvey S. Firestone
Our discussions this week about conflict resolution and experiencing
the limits of “comfortable” collaboration really struck a chord with me. I feel that all too often we shield our
knowledge from others out of a fear that the writers asking for our help will
see right through our guidance and only see opposition. But what we have to offer the writers at
Boise State is so much more than questions of clarity, mechanics, and
form.
I feel that sometimes what a writer needs is for the session
to get “dirty”. Ask the tougher
questions that open their eyes to the opposition when their assignment calls
for it. Just as we need to understand
that they aren’t attacking us as people when their claim goes against what we
personally believe, they need to realize that we aren’t attacking theirs when
we advise them to seek out their opposition.
Understand their “enemy” if you will.
Because, at the end of the day, one of the most fundamental qualities
one must demonstrate in the real world is the art of rhetorical
effectiveness.
I believe that our center carries the burden of not just
being there to help writers write but to help students understand their role as
citizens of the world. And it’s not so
much as a burden but an opportunity to remind us that we have the ability to learn
just as much from them as they do from us.
I didn’t have the pleasure of witnessing a consultation this
week. However, in talks with consultants
this week I found that this dance of advising students is a tricky one. Once we’ve struck a chord in some writers,
they can see us as more than writing consultants but as student guides and we
must be careful in that we don’t have the luxury of holding their hand
throughout their college experience.
Remember that we are there to instill the foundation, teach them to
think critically for themselves.
Maybe it’s a generational gap that I’m experiencing but I
have to admit that this week was a bit difficult for me in that I saw the major
issue of uncomfortable collaboration as something to look forward to. The writing process is messy, and downright
ugly-- at least for me—so as a writer I want a consultant that isn’t afraid to
question my stance on an issue, force me to look outside of my little
protective cocoon made up of my beliefs and values to see what my paper is
lacking. And in the end, I will know
that my consultant is trying to make me a better writer; a better citizen of
the world. If we can take this approach with us when we consult will all writers, then I believe that success is truly ours for the taking.
Hi, Ali!
ReplyDeleteI think you’re absolutely right that you might be better prepared (and ready!) to get to the messy part of the work in the Center. To do so, one must feel comfortable in his/her/their/human/people skin. And that can really only happen with time. Once you feel more confident about your own values can you begin to question them (and allow others to question them). This, as Robert said in class, is an opportunity for us. We can help writers begin to question where their opinions are coming from. Many of them won’t even know yet that they should be questioning these things!
Our approach, of course, is key. How can we get writers to begin questioning their own ideas? Well, we can’t shut them down—we have to ease them into it. Often times we can do this without them even knowing what we’re doing. I call this “ninja-ing” a session. You’ll see a lot of this going on in the sessions once you get a chance to observe. By the end of the semester you’ll be your own ninja, and the students you work with won’t even see it coming (and they might not even recognize it happened after it’s all said and done)—that’s good ninja-ing.
I look forward to hearing what you think about an observation next week! We’ll also be discussing “Provocative Revision,” and I think you’re going to enjoy the reading.
I hope you’re having a good weekend!
Melissa