This week was filled with a multi-faceted understanding of
peer-tutoring, identity, and writing center theory. I felt that I was tested this week; I have to
have a firm grasp on who I am—as a person, a peer, a representative of academic
support, in the lives of my family—and each of these roles requires a steadfast
conviction that there is a purpose to my being where I’m at during this stage
in my life.
All too often I believe that guilt keeps me from providing
one hundred percent of myself to the task at hand. What I mean by this is I felt like I was
shortchanging all that interacted with me this week; the responsibilities that
I had in my academic life never garnered my full attention because I was too
busy focusing on all of them at once rather than prioritizing or managing my
time toward each task. I felt like a hypocrite
in that I was demonstrating the very mindset that we’re advised to tell our
clients NOT to have.
My stumbling block has always been that I tend to take on
more responsibility than I am ultimately capable of handling—but my desire to
help others, to expand my learning, or even break free from this character flaw
overrides all other thoughts.
Regardless, I do feel that this week offered my so much in the way of
practical experience—I was able to share my new writing consultant experiences
with high school students embarking on the same journey. Witnessing the passion I feel for helping
peers become better writers was inspiring—I actually believe that my
participation in this panel gave me the strength needed, knowing that there is a reason for
creating the chaos that resulted over the last 10 days.
It is often very
difficult for me to put into words, a verbal explanation, what it is I offer
the academic community at Boise State. This
bumps heads with the difficulties many clients that seek our help at the Writing
Center--with articulating their ideas into words on the page. I don’t think that enough has been said about
the identities of peer consultants that pour their blood, sweat, and tears into
their work with student writers.
Researching writing center pedagogy plus working on how to
provide feedback on writing through the email service this week allowed me to
see that identity shapes every aspect of what it is we offer as writing
consultants. Who am I-- to my fellow
consultants? To the student writers? How
does what I feel about myself within the various roles that I play contribute
to the responses I deliver through email? Then, to take this even further… what
do my feelings do in regard to my relationship with loved ones that don’t seem
to share the same connection with writing that I have?
I struggled a bit with making sure that the response I
crafted for our mock email consultation came across as authentic—I made sure
that I gave myself only the one hour to complete the response so that I had a
realistic understanding of the pressure to prioritize. But I also wanted to convey to the writer
that what I had to offer was beneficial to them—that there is a passion for teaching them to be better writers, and all
that I was offering were ways in which they could strengthen their craft not
merely critiquing their paper. I think
that in a way I was trying to reaffirm my feelings toward writing and sharing
my love for it with others through peer tutoring. Demonstrating this through the mock email
consult somehow served as a catharsis—a release of all the pent up frustration I
feel when my family questions what it is that I want to do with my life, or
degree.
It seems really overdramatic, but the act of drafting my
response helped me clarify who I am and what it is I want to offer the
literary/academic worlds. But I still am
unsure of how to approach my analysis of a WCJ article…perhaps if I found
something that demystifies the concept of writing center identity from the
perspective of the consultants I could be surer of what it is I want to talk
about. So far, I have enjoyed the
scavenger hunt through scholarship pertaining to the non-traditional student
and have downloaded a few ancillary articles from Glaskow and Fulwiler about
the inner-workings of the writing center/W.A.C relationship. I promise that I will narrow this down as I
continue to dig.
For now, I’m enjoying the process of finding my identity
within the BSU Writing Center Community…..
Hefty post here, Ali!
ReplyDeleteFirst, if you're the kind of person who takes on more than she can handle, you're in good company, my friend! I find that is one of the qualities that stretches across most of our consultants. You all are busy folks who work hard and who take on too much. You're also a group of people who don't like to half-ass anything. I know this because I can spot my own kind. :)
Since you haven't settled on an article yet, may I suggest one? I think you'd benefit (and by "you" I mean your soul) from reading a longitudinal study that came out in 2010 called "What They Take with Them: Findings from the Peer Writing Tutor Alumni Research Project," which followed tutors for YEARS after they worked in their centers. The study reports back all they ways these folks benefited from doing writing center work. I think that as you're struggling through these issues of identity, you would find some solace in the words of these former consultants/tutors. You may also develop some pretty good quips to the question about you'll benefit from being an English major. :) The writing center gig provides as a practical of a skill set as any other on the planet. (Not that I'm biased or anything...)
I'll send you that article. If you want to follow it, then great. If you'd like to follow another, that would be great too! Let me know what you think!
~mk